The sequence diagrams are getting complicated.
I am now looking at the benefits that UML 2.0 can bring us in reducing the complexity.
I mean I started off modelling the sequence diagram for the prepare itinerary use case and ended up with a diagram that didn't fit on the screen any more, and I didn't even modelled the business functionality yet, I stopped at the business delegate.
So looking at the new elements in UML 2.0 I found the Interaction Overview diagrams useful for splitting the complex sequence diagram into smaller more usable chunks.
I'd like to soon finish the sequence diagram for this first, but major, use case and then start modelling the class diagram.
When that has been done, most likely I will need to correct my sequence diagrams again to reflect corrected flaws discovered when doing the class diagram.
In the mean time I am having a great discussion on javaranch about a discrepancy in the requirements. The prepare itinerary scenario mentions alternative flights within one hour and less than the selected, while in the given interview with CEO and CIO the flights have a flat price per destination, per seat class. Another thread on javaranch discusses the difference (or lack off) between flight and segment.
Speeking with UB40: both these discussions give me quite some food for thought!
I am now looking at the benefits that UML 2.0 can bring us in reducing the complexity.
I mean I started off modelling the sequence diagram for the prepare itinerary use case and ended up with a diagram that didn't fit on the screen any more, and I didn't even modelled the business functionality yet, I stopped at the business delegate.
So looking at the new elements in UML 2.0 I found the Interaction Overview diagrams useful for splitting the complex sequence diagram into smaller more usable chunks.
I'd like to soon finish the sequence diagram for this first, but major, use case and then start modelling the class diagram.
When that has been done, most likely I will need to correct my sequence diagrams again to reflect corrected flaws discovered when doing the class diagram.
In the mean time I am having a great discussion on javaranch about a discrepancy in the requirements. The prepare itinerary scenario mentions alternative flights within one hour and less than the selected, while in the given interview with CEO and CIO the flights have a flat price per destination, per seat class. Another thread on javaranch discusses the difference (or lack off) between flight and segment.
Speeking with UB40: both these discussions give me quite some food for thought!
View My profile